Sunday, May 21, 2023

Demythologizing pagan titles, stories and ideas in the Bible

Demythologizing paganism: Part II


A popular charge against Catholics by some more radical and low church Protestants and Jehovah Witnesses is that we incorporate elements of paganism. What they fail to learn is that the Bible itself incorporates some aspects of paganism then demythologizes and baptizes them. Some or much of these can be explained by the verse:
 For it is precept for a precept, precept for a precept, line for a line... --Isaiah 28:10

Generally, translated "line upon line" but the words for "upon" is not there but rather L' is used which means either to, for, about, or concerning. The explanation provided by those such as the interpreter Rashi is God provides a law to counter the law of a pagan deity. Perhaps, part of God's plan was to rob the idols of their glory by taking away their names for Himself.

In addition, some motifs are widespread and can be found in unrelated cultures and lands.

 Biblical characters names and titles:

Eve:
וַיִּקְרָא הָאָדָם שֵׁם אִשְׁתּוֹ, חַוָּה:  כִּי הִוא הָיְתָה, אֵם כָּל-חָי
And the man called his wife's name Eve (חַוָּה havvah); because she was the mother of all living.--Genesis 3:20 

On the matter of Eve the Dictionary of Deities says: 

"It is evident, that despite Eve's present creaturely status, various fragments of mythological tradition are present in the story, and various scholars have concluded from these that a goddess lies behind Eve. Thus, the Sumerian divine name nin.ti, 'Lady of Life' (AGE 419), which is structurally similar to the aetiology for Eve offered above, and is itself ambiguous in meaning, having also the sense 'Lady of the Rib', is cited by GASTER (1969:21). KIKAWADA (1972:33) draws attention to the Akkadian formula belet kala ili, 'Mistress of all the gods', applied to the goddess Mami in Atr. I 246-248, and suggests that Mami underlies Eve, who is however supposedly demythologized (24-35)...A goddess named Hwt appears in KAI 89. 1, in a votive stela from the Carthaginian necropolis, beginning with the invocation rbt hwt 'lt mlkt...: 'Great Lady. Havvat, Goddess, Queen(?)!' HROZNY (1932:121-122) proposed that hwt is related to the Hurrian divine name Hebat. She was the consort of Teshub, the Hurrian storm-god.--Eve, Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible. page 317

Note that though Ninti was called "Lady of the Rib" she was not made from a rib as Eve is described. Also, she was created to heal another god mortally wounded due to his sexual exploits and eating from a tree. Also, note another mention of the Hurrian "storm god" named Teshub who is the equivalent to the Canaanite god Baal. Ninti seems to only very superficially have commonality with Eve.

 The Dictionary takes Genesis 4 as good evidence Eve is a de-mythologized goddess:

"The second OT reference to Eve (MT Hawwa, LXX eva) is in Gen 4:1. where on giving birth to Cain, Eve cries in triumph "I have given birth to a man by Yahweh!" or "I have acquired a husband, Yahweh!"....Whether Yahweh is the father of the man she has begotten or the husband she has acquired, the implication is that Eve plays the role of, indeed is, a goddess.--Eve, Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible. page 317

 It's also noteworthy that in some other semitic languages Eve's name can mean "snake." For instance, the Targum of Genesis, written in Aramaic says:

וַאֲמַר חִוְיָא, לְאִתְּתָא:  לָא מְמָת, תְּמוּתוּן. --Targum Genesis 3:4

vaammar hivya (חִוְיָא), l'it'tan: la m'mat t'mutuk--Targum Genesis 3:4

וַיֹּ֥אמֶר הַנָּחָ֖שׁ אֶל־הָֽאִשָּׁ֑ה לֹֽא־מ֖וֹת תְּמֻתֽוּן-- Genesis 3:4 (Hebrew Masoretic)

And the serpent (Aramaic: Hivya חִוְיָא , Hebrew: hanaHash, הַנָּחָ֖שׁ) said unto the woman: 'Ye shall not surely die--Genesis 3:4

חִוְיָא means "the serpent" with the definite article א as a suffix.

The Peshitta text reads:

ܘܐܡܼܪ ܚܘܝܐ ܠܐܢܬܬܐ܂ ܠܐ ܡܡܬ ܬܡܘܬܘܢ܂--Genesis 3:4 Peshitta

This seems to match the targum above, but using another script for that says ܚܘܝܐ whereas the targum uses the Hebrew square script with חִוְיָא.

Later, the woman is named Eve--חַוָּה Havvah:

וַיִּקְרָא הָאָדָם שֵׁם אִשְׁתּוֹ, חַוָּה:  כִּי הִוא הָיְתָה, אֵם כָּל-חָי--Genesis 3:20

And the man called his wife's name Eve[חַוָּה havvah]; because she was the mother of all living.--Genesis 3:20 

Hebrew/Aramaic Eve: חַוָּה  Havvah

Aramaic Snake:  חִוְיָא ܚܘܝܐ  hivyah

The explanation DDD gives is that Adam considered her a snake in the sense the snake was Eve's snake in seducing him to sin.

Concerning the title "mother of all living":

1. e-nu-ma e-lisz la na-bu-u2 sza2-ma-mu
 en: When on high the heaven had not been named,
2. szap-lisz am-ma-tum szu-ma la zak-rat
 en: Firm ground below had not been called by name,
3. _abzu_-u-ma resz-tu-u2 za-ru-szu-un
 en: When primordial Apsu, their begetter,
4. mu-um-mu ti-amat mu-al-li-da-at gim-ri-szu2-un
 en: And Mummu-Tiamat, she who bore them all,
5. _me-mesz_-szu2-nu isz-te-nisz i-hi-qu-u2-ma
 en: Their waters mingled as a single body, --Enumas Elish, Composite No.: Q002718

 Yet, another translation instead of "she who bore them all" is found:

 Creation of man from the Earth:

Genesis has man made from the dust of the ground:

וַיִּיצֶר יְהוָה אֱלֹהִים אֶת-הָאָדָם, עָפָר מִן-הָאֲדָמָה, וַיִּפַּח בְּאַפָּיו, נִשְׁמַת חַיִּים; וַיְהִי הָאָדָם, לְנֶפֶשׁ חַיָּה
Then the LORD God formed man (הָאָדָם ha-adam) of the dust of the ground (הָאֲדָמָה haadamah), and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.--Genesis 2:7

 This belief man was created from clay in very common throughout the globe in many indigenous lore.

 The ancient near east scholar Samuel Noah Kramer sums the ancient near eastern beliefs as:

Among the oldest known conceptions of the creation of man are those of the Hebrews and the Babylonians; the former is narrated in the book of Genesis, the latter forms part of the Babylonian "Epic of Creation." According to the Biblical story, or at least according to one of its versions, man was fashioned from clay for the purpose of ruling over all the animals. In the Babylonian myth, man was made of the blood of one of the more troublesome of the gods who was killed for that purpose; he was created primarily in order to serve the gods and free them from the need of working for their bread. According to our Sumerian poem, which antedates both the Hebrew and the Babylonian versions by more than a millennium, man was fashioned of clay as in the Biblical version. The purpose for which he was created, however, was to free the gods from laboring for their sustenance, as in the Babylonian version.--Sumerian Mythology, Samuel Noah Kramer

Here the pagan Akkadian account of man's creation has minor gods being put to hard labor by their higher ups, tired of the manual labor they rebel, so to end the rebellion the higher gods decide to assign the task of making humans to the goddess Mami/Nintu. Humanity according to this Epic is a composite of clay, flesh and blood, the latter two being from a selected lesser god (they picked Aw-ilu, god of intelligence):

Enki made ready to speak, and said to the great gods: "On the first, seventh, and fifteenth days of the month, let me establish a purification, a bath. Let one god be slaughtered, then let the gods be cleansed by immersion. Let Nintu mix clay with his flesh and blood. Let that same god and man be thoroughly mixed in the clay. Let us hear the drum for the rest of the time. From the flesh of the god let a spirit remain, let it make the living know its sign, lest he be allowed to be forgotten, let the spirit remain." The great Anunna-gods, who administer destinies, answered "yes!" in the assembly.

On the first, seventh, and fifteenth days of the month, he established a purification, a bath. They slaughtered Aw-ilu, who had the inspiration, in their assembly. Nintu mixed clay with his flesh and blood. That same god and man were thoroughly mixed in the clay.-- The Epic of Atraḥasis

Note the mention of immersion/baptism shows the practice pre-dates the Bible itself. The pagan accounts of creation overall have only a few elements in common with the Biblical account, in this case its clay and humans being made to work. Contrary to the pagan account, the Biblical account has God making man a king, where he has dominion of the land and made in the image of God himself. The closest mention to blood in the Biblical account is the name Adam/human itself, dam means blood in Hebrew, in Akkadian it's damu. Obviously, in the Biblical account there is no god slaughtered and ground up to make man. 

Another account reads:

"O my mother, the creature whose name you uttered, it exists 
Bind upon it the image (?) of the gods; 
Mix the heart of the clay that is over the abyss, 
The good and princely fashioners will thicken the clay, 
You, do you bring the limbs into existence;
Ninmah (the earth-mother goddess) will work above you, 
The goddesses (of birth) .... will stand by you at your fashioning; 
O my mother, decree its (the newborn’s) fate, 
Ninmah will bind upon it the image (?) of the gods, It is man.”--History Began at Sumer, p. 158, 163, Samuel Noah Kramer

 The same author provided the same account here, noting parts are missing (he also completely omits the word image). Assuming his guess that image is the word intended, it would be another parallel with Genesis.

A summary of a related item states:

ETEMMU - The immaterial spirit released from the human being at death, not to be confused with the soul. The etemmu was the animating spirit breathed into the first humans created from the remains of the god Quingu after his death. The flesh of Quingu was mixed with clay and blood but animated through etemmu, a spirit of transience, so that, though created from an immortal god, human beings would still die.--World History Encyclopedia, The Mesopotamian Pantheon

There is conceivable Christological 'fulfillment' even of this pagan account where Christ's flesh and blood is sacrificed and mingles without earthly nature. Similar can be said of the barbaric practice of the Phoenicians of sacrificing their children to appease the gods (they only selected children of noble birth, ironically sparing the "useless" lives of the sons of commoners). Despite the evils they commit a trace of Christ can be seen within their error. 

Image of God 

Genesis 1:26 states the first human was made in God's image. 

And God said: 'Let us make man in our image [בְּצַלְמֵנוּ], after our likeness[כִּדְמוּתֵנוּ]; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.' And God created man in His own image [בְּצַלְמוֹ], in the image [בְּצֶלֶם] of God created He him; male and female created He them. --Genesis 1:26-27

 וַיֹּאמֶר אֱלֹהִים, נַעֲשֶׂה אָדָם בְּצַלְמֵנוּ כִּדְמוּתֵנוּ; וְיִרְדּוּ בִדְגַת הַיָּם וּבְעוֹף הַשָּׁמַיִם, וּבַבְּהֵמָה וּבְכָל-הָאָרֶץ, וּבְכָל-הָרֶמֶשׂ, הָרֹמֵשׂ עַל-הָאָרֶץ.וַיִּבְרָא אֱלֹהִים אֶת-הָאָדָם בְּצַלְמוֹ, בְּצֶלֶם אֱלֹהִים בָּרָא אֹתוֹ:  זָכָר וּנְקֵבָה, בָּרָא אֹתָם.-- Masoretic Text Genesis 1:26-27

As many note, in the original meaning was kingship/authority. This was not lost on St Ephraim the Syrian who interpreted the verse by what immediately followed, "and let them have dominion over...". 

Though God made Adam a viceroy, the term in the Bible is applied to humans in general, especially for men, and especially Christ. Regardless, the "democratization" of the term is noted rather than exclusively being title of a pagan king. 

The Egyptians seemed to acknowledge man was the image of God in the 2nd-3rd century BC:

Serve God, that he may do the like for you, with offerings for replenishing the altars and with carving; it is that which will show forth your name, and God is aware of whoever serves Him. Provide for men, the cattle of God, for He made heaven and earth at their desire. He suppressed the greed of the waters, He gave the breath of life to their noses, for they are likenesses of Him which issued from His flesh. He shines in the sky for the benefit of their hearts; He has made herbs, cattle, and fish to nourish them.--The Instruction of Merikare

another translation reads:

Well tended is humankind--god's cattle, he made sky and earth for their sake, he subdued the water monster, he made breath for their noses to live. They are his images, who came from his body, he shines in the sky for their sake; he made for them plants and cattle, fowl and fish to feed them.--Ancient Egyptian Literature by Miriam Lichtheim, The Instruction of Merikare

The writing seems to have predated Moses slightly or possibly was contemporary with him. Interesting is the word Instructions is used. Torah also means "instruction" the Egyptian word was sebayt. Sebayt certainly overlaps with Biblical wisdom literature, of the same genre. As the next example shows.

Also see Othmar Keel and Silvia Schroer, Creation: Biblical Theologies in the Context of the Ancient Near East [trans. Peter D. Daniels; Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns, 2015], 142-43

Proverbs 22-23 and the Instructions of Amenemope (clear link)

For at least a century, scholars have debated whether Proverbs 22-23 borrows from the Egyptian work Instructions of Amenemope. Generally, it is accepted Instructions of Amenemope came first since it is debated to before King Solomon's lifetime. It wouldn't be too surprising for King Solomon to know about Egyptian literature, Solomon had good relations with Egypt, in fact one of his many wives was the daughter of Pharoah (something otherwise unheard of in ancient Egypt for a royal woman to be married off abroad). Proverbs in addition to the Egyptian influence seems to have Aramaic influence in Proverbs 31 (using the Aramaic word for son, however some say a Hebrew word is meant).

This book has an article comparing and showing recent scholarship on the matter.

One of the more interesting pieces of evidence for an Egyptian original is the usage of the belly as man's seat of knowledge, whereas the OT uses the Semitic "heart" for that.

For it is a pleasant thing if you keep them in your belly (בְּבִטְנֶךָ ); let them be established altogether on your lips--Proverbs 22:18 (modernized Douai Rheims)

כִּי-נָעִים, כִּי-תִשְׁמְרֵם בְּבִטְנֶךָ;    יִכֹּנוּ יַחְדָּו, עַל-שְׂפָתֶיךָ--Proverbs 22:18 

The DRB is based originally on the Latin Vulgate, but in this case, it's closer to the Hebrew text than almost all other translations, since it does not obscure the mention of "belly".

Let the rest in the casket of your belly; may they be a lock in your heart; when there rises a storm of words, they will be a mooring post for your tongue--Amenemope, 1.3:11-16

Many more parallels can be seen in the article linked above.

Leviathan--Litani (clear link)

The sea serpent Leviathan is mentioned about 4 times explicitly in the OT 
Canst thou draw out leviathan (לִוְיָתָן) with an hook? or his tongue with a cord [which] thou lettest down?--Job 41:1 (40:25) 
תִּמְשֹׁךְ לִוְיָתָן בְּחַכָּה;    וּבְחֶבֶל, תַּשְׁקִיעַ לְשֹׁנוֹ--Job 40:25
Thou didst crush the heads of leviathan (לִוְיָתָן), Thou gavest him to be food to the folk inhabiting the wilderness.--Psalm 74:14

 אַתָּה רִצַּצְתָּ, רָאשֵׁי לִוְיָתָן;    תִּתְּנֶנּוּ מַאֲכָל, לְעָם לְצִיִּים --Psalm 74:14

There go the ships: [there is] that leviathan (לִוְיָתָן), [whom] thou hast made to play therein.--Psalm 104:26 

שָׁם, אֳנִיּוֹת יְהַלֵּכוּן;    לִוְיָתָן, זֶה-יָצַרְתָּ לְשַׂחֶק-בּוֹ--Psalm 104:26 

In that day the LORD with his sore and great and strong sword shall punish leviathan (לִוְיָתָן) the piercing serpent, even leviathan (לִוְיָתָן) that crooked serpent; and he shall slay the dragon that [is] in the sea.--Isaiah 27:1

בַּיּוֹם הַהוּא יִפְקֹד יְהוָה בְּחַרְבּוֹ הַקָּשָׁה וְהַגְּדוֹלָה וְהַחֲזָקָה, עַל לִוְיָתָן נָחָשׁ בָּרִחַ, וְעַל לִוְיָתָן, נָחָשׁ עֲקַלָּתוֹן; וְהָרַג אֶת-הַתַּנִּין, אֲשֶׁר בַּיָּם. 

Note Psalm 74:14 speaks of the Leviathan as having "heads." In Ancient near east mythology the sea monster Lotan/Litani is sometimes depicted with seven heads (a description Revelation 12 and 13 uses) and was symbolic of chaos and represented at times the god of the sea Yam, the rival of Baal, the sky god (in the OT Baal is seen as the pagan rival to YHVH).
In Ugarit, Leviathan (ltn) is described as a malicious (brh), coiled ('qltn) serpent-dragon (btn) with seven heads (sb't r'sm) (cf. Isa 27:1).--The Symbolism of the Biblical World Ancient Near Eastern Iconography and the Book of Psalms by Othmar Keel, page 51
"In KTU 1.5 i:1 || 27, it designates a 'fugitive serpent' (btn brh), cf. Heb nahas bariah in Isa 27:1 and Job 26:3) smitten by the victorious weather-god Ba'alu (Baal). Two closely related epithets, 'wriggling serpent' (btn 'qltn, cf. Heb nahas 'aqallaton in Isa 27:1) and 'Mighty one(?) with seven heads' (slyt d.sb't rasm), are usually understood to refer to Leviathan, too, and the former is certainly used in this sense in Isa 27:1. Originally, however, they may well have referred to at least one other monster, mentioned again in KTU 1.3 iii:41-42 together with the god Yammu (Sea). a dragon (Tannin) and four other helper at his disposal--as did Mesopotamian representatives of chaos...A seven-headed serpent (mus-sag-imin) partly overcome by an anthropomorphic hero or god is attested as early as the third mill. BCE in Mesopotamian iconography"--Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible, Leviathan, page 512 

Since the discovery of the Ugaritic from 1929 onwards, however, it becomes clear that the immediate background of the Old Testament allusions to the sea monster is not Babylonian but Canaanite. The Ugartic text contains not only an account of Baal's defeat of the rebellious sea-god Yam, as a result of which he was acclaimed king (CT A 2 = KTU 1.2), but also allusions to a defeat of Leviathan (ltn = Litan, lit. 'twisting one', from lwh 'to twist'), whom we learn had seven heads (CT A 3.IIID.37-9, 5.I.1-3 = KTU 1.3.40-2, 1.5.I.1-3; Ps. 74:14 refers to 'heads' but does not specify how many) and who is called not only 'the twisting serpent' (btn brh, CT A 5.I.1 = KTU 1.5.I.1, cf. nahas bariah in Job 26:13, Is. 27:1). We also find Leviathan called tnn 'dragon', a term identical with the tannin mentioned in various Old Testament passages (cf. Is 27:1, 51:9...). Ugaritic tnn was vocalized tu-un-na-nu, as we now know from Ugaritica V. 137.8. The name ltn has generally been vocalized Lotan since Albright proposed this in 1932.... --God's Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea, Echoes of a Canaanite myth in the Old Testament, by John Day. page 4-5

The story of Leviathan (litani) reads in part:
[Have you then forgotten, Baal, that I can surely transfix you]...for all that you smote Leviathan (ltn) the slippery serpent (and) made an end of the wriggling serpent, the tyrant with seven heads?...--Canaanite Myths and Legends, 2nd edition, by JCL Gibson, Baal and Mot, page 68, Column 2 translated from CT A 4 (Corpus tablettes alphabetiques)

Again, Leviathan is alluded to in recounting the story of Baal,

She lifted up her voice and cried: How (is it that) Gupn and Ugar have arrived? What foe rises against Baal, (what) enemy against the rider on the clouds? Did I not destroy Yam the darling of El, did I not make an end of Nahar the great god? Was not the dragon captured (and) vanquished? I did destroy the wriggling serpent, the tyrant with seven heads--Canaanite Myths and Legends, 2nd edition, by JCL Gibson, The Palace of Baal. page 50, Column 2 translated from CT A 4 (Corpus tablettes alphabetiques)

The Egyptians also make mention of the water monster in their account of creation:

Well tended is humankind--god's cattle, he made sky and earth for their sake, he subdued the water monster, he made breath for their noses to live. They are his images, who came from his body, he shines in the sky for their sake; he made for them plants and cattle, fowl and fish to feed them.--Ancient Egyptian Literature by Miriam Lichtheim, The Instruction of Merikare

The Egyptian chaos god Apep/Apophis is depicted sometimes as a giant snake or a crocodile and fights with the sun/sky god Ra, humorously depicted as taking form of a cat to saw Apep in pieces. 

Like the Cannanite Litani, Revelation 12 and 13 make mentions of monsters with 7 heads. The first is made with no clear mention of the sea but like Leviathan is called a dragon with 7 heads:
And another sign appeared in heaven: behold, a great red dragon, with seven heads and ten horns, and on his heads seven diadems--Revelation 12:3
His henchman is another seven-headed monster, how arising from the sea:
And I saw a beast rising out of the sea, with ten horns and seven heads, with ten diadems on its horns and blasphemous names on its heads. The beast I saw was like a leopard, but it had feet like a bear's, and its mouth was like the mouth of a lion--Revelation 13:1-2

The description of this evil "chaos" monster, in addition to having the 7 heads like Leviathan, was a hybrid or composite animal which also fits the ancient near east mythological description (click to link to see the imagery reproduced):

Ancient Near East pictures show a similar variety in representation of Chaos monster. In Figs. 42-44 the Chaos dragon is depicted as a composite creature, half lion and half eagle; in Figs. 46-50 it appears in the form of a serpent; and in Figs. 51 and 52 it is a seven-headed monster.--The Symbolism of the Biblical World Ancient Near Eastern Iconography and the Book of Psalms by Othmar Keel, p. 50
Revelation 13 proceeds to state the dragon gave his authority to the beast--which is either a Satanic counterpart to Christ receiving authority from the Father (Daniel 7) which itself may be intended to resemble Baal receiving authority from El (Baal Cycle), or perhaps like Yam and Leviathan where Leviathan sometimes seems to be Baal himself.

Also see https://www.google.com/books/edition/Chaos_and_the_Son_of_Man/Pclh3olxIAUC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=ktu+leviathan&pg=PA4&printsec=frontcover

Adam and Adapa (small link)

The similarity is somewhat basic.

ADAPA - In Sumerian and Babylonian mythology, the first created man, son of Ea (or Enki) who, in anger at the overturning of his boat, broke the wings of the South Wind and had to travel to the heavens to apologize to Anu. Ea, knowing that Anu would offer Adapa the food of immortality and wishing human beings to remain mortal, warned the man not to eat or drink of anything while in the land of the gods as doing so would surely kill him. Adapa heeds Ea's advice and refuses the food and drink offered to him and, so, is tricked out of the chance at immortality. He was the first among the Abgal, the seven ancient sages.--World History Encyclopedia, The Mesopotamian Pantheon

Though most does not apply to Adam, being denied immortality via eating a specific food is in common.
The Myth of Adapa (also known as Adapa and the Food of Life) is the Mesopotamian story of the Fall of Man in that it explains why human beings are mortal. The god of wisdom, Ea, creates the first man, Adapa, and endows him with great intelligence and wisdom but not with immortality, and when immortality is offered Adapa by the great god Anu, Ea tricks Adapa into refusing the gift.... 
Once Adapa is in the presence of Anu, Ea further tells him, he should refuse any food or drink offered because it will be the food of death and the drink of death which will be offered as punishment for Adapa breaking the wing of the south wind. However, Ea says, Adapa may accept oil to anoint himself and accept whatever clothing is offered.
Adapa does exactly as Ea suggests, respectfully honoring Tammuz and Gishida and refusing the food and drink offered by Anu (though anointing himself and accepting a robe). Anu, puzzled that the man should refuse the food and drink of life and the gift of immortality, sends Adapa back to earth where he must live out his life as a mortal.-- World History Encyclopedia, The Myth of Adapa
Cherubim and the Sphinx/Lamassu (definite link)

 Interesting, the cherub is linked to the sphinx of the ancient near east (it is not unique to Egypt):

"It denotes the Israelite counterpart of the sphinx known from the pictorial art of the ancient Near East. In the Bible the cherubim occur essentially in two functions: as guardians of a sacred tree or as a guardian and carrier of a throne....There is no consensus on the etymology of the term....the most probable is that the Heb term is connected with Akk karibu, kuribu both used with reference to genii in Mesopotamian mythology and art....sphinxes and biblical cherubim occur in precisely the same above-mentioned functions....

...the sphinx throne with the sphinxes as an integral element of the throne itself (thus not only flanking the throne) is a Syrian innovation from the time of the 19th Egyptian dynasty. While the Egyptian lion-paws throne never carried a god, the Syrian sphinx throne was used for both gods and kings."--Dictionary of Demons and Deities in the Bible, Cherubim, p. 189-190

The most well known sphinx is the Great Sphinx in Egypt that dates to around 2500 BC, well before the Exodus. As noted above, they were found in Egypt, the near East, and Greece.

Another source when describing the cherubim says,

Common motifs in ancient Israelite art include plants flanked by animals, astral symbols (such as sun-disks and stars), adapted forms of Egyptian symbols (such as winged sphinxes, uraei, and falcons), various animals (such as lions, ostriches, and bulls), and monsters (such as Cherubs - creatures akin to the Lamassu). --World History, Ancient Israelite Art

These Lamassu with bodies of lions, faces of a big bearded man with wings, are described as:

This is a pair of guardian figures (winged human-headed lions) that flanked one of the entrances into the throne room of Ashurnasirpal II (883-859 BCE). Stone mythological guardians, sculpted in relief or in the round, were often placed at gateways to ancient Mesopotamian palaces, to protect them from demonic forces. They were known to the Assyrians as lamassu. This winged lion has five legs so that when viewed from the front it is standing firm, and when viewed from the side it appears to be striding forward against any evil. It wears ropes like other protective spirits.--World History Encyclopedia, Lamassu from Ashurnasirpal II Palace

They are also described as: 

LAMASSU - The famous Assyrian winged bull-man who adorned palaces and temples to frighten off the forces of chaos. The Lamassu were protective spirits who were sometimes depicted as the Bull-Man (human above the waist and bull below) but, more often as a human-headed bull or lion with wings.--World History Encyclopedia, The Mesopotamian Pantheon

Ezekiel describes some cherubs as, which were associated with the temple and "something that looked like a throne" (Ezekiel 10:1-3):

Each living creature had four faces: the first a cherub, the second a human being, the third a lion, the fourth an eagle. When the cherubim rose up, they were indeed the living creatures I had seen by the river Chebar. When the cherubim moved, the wheels went beside them; when the cherubim lifted up their wings to rise from the earth, even then the wheels did not leave their sides. --Ezekiel 10:14-16

Similar is used in Revelation 4 without explicitly calling them cherubs:

In the center and around the throne, there were four living creatures covered with eyes in front and in back. The first creature resembled a lion, the second was like a calf, the third had a face like that of a human being, and the fourth looked like an eagle in flight. The four living creatures, each of them with six wings, were covered with eyes inside and out. Day and night they do not stop exclaiming...--Revelation 4:6-8

The first time a cherub is mentioned is in the expulsion from the Garden of Eden:

He expelled the man, stationing the cherubim and the fiery revolving sword east of the garden of Eden, to guard the way to the tree of life. --Genesis 3:24

The cherubim are once again "guards." The Solomonic temple used much Garden of Eden imagery (trees, animals), and as mentioned in my commentary on John 19, so does the crucifixion of cross mention a garden, soldiers, sword, angels, and the tree of Life (called so in Revelation).

Contrary to common interpretation of the cherubs in Christian and later Jewish interpretation, cherubs are meant to be terrifying guardians. Despite the mention in Genesis, it's not mentioned again until Exodus and Numbers and there only referring to a statue of cherubim on the Ark of the Covenant. The only description of a cherub in the Torah is that they have wings and are guardians.

And the cherubs have been spreading out wings on high, covering the mercy-seat over with their wings, and their faces are one towards another -- towards the mercy-seat are the faces of the cherubs.--Exodus 25:20

The God of Israel when speaking in reference to the Ark of the Covenant in the Old Testament is sometimes poetically referred to as "

Cherubim are hybrid animals (somewhat like the chaos monsters). 

Some pagan thrones of gods were decorated with cherubs.

Cherubim decorated the Ark of the Covenant in Exodus 25:20, the cherubs as described above were hybrid animals, often lions (like the sphinxes that decorated thrones). Solomon's own royal throne was decorated with lions (lions are associated with royalty in the Bible, "lion of the tribe of Judah"):

Moreover the king made a great throne of ivory, and overlaid it with the finest gold. There were six steps to the throne, and the top of the throne was round behind; and there were arms on either side by the place of the seat, and two lions standing beside the arms. And twelve lions stood there on the one side and on the other upon the six steps; there was not the like made in any kingdom.--1 Kings 10:20-21

 Lions are a common theme in ancient Israelite art.

Ark of the covenant vs Egyptian Arks (slight similarities)

The cherubim were located on the Ark of the Covenant, Israel's portable temple, which was the interface between Heaven and Earth, where God's dwelt in a unique way.

“They shall make an ark of acacia wood. Two cubits and a half shall be its length, a cubit and a half its breadth, and a cubit and a half its height. You shall overlay it with pure gold, inside and outside shall you overlay it, and you shall make on it a molding of gold around it. You shall cast four rings of gold for it and put them on its four feet, two rings on the one side of it, and two rings on the other side of it. You shall make poles of acacia wood and overlay them with gold. And you shall put the poles into the rings on the sides of the ark to carry the ark by them. The poles shall remain in the rings of the ark; they shall not be taken from it. And you shall put into the ark the testimony that I shall give you.  “You shall make a mercy seat of pure gold. Two cubits and a half shall be its length, and a cubit and a half its breadth. And you shall make two cherubim of gold; of hammered work shall you make them, on the two ends of the mercy seat. Make one cherub on the one end, and one cherub on the other end. Of one piece with the mercy seat shall you make the cherubim on its two ends. The cherubim shall spread out their wings above, overshadowing the mercy seat with their wings, their faces one to another; toward the mercy seat shall the faces of the cherubim be. And you shall put the mercy seat on the top of the ark, and in the ark you shall put the testimony that I shall give you. There I will meet with you, and from above the mercy seat, from between the two cherubim that are on the ark of the testimony, I will speak with you about all that I will give you in commandment for the people of Israel--Exodus 25:10-22

Concerning the word for ark here itself, it is in Hebrew אֲרוֹן aron:

And they shall make an ark of acacia-wood: two cubits and a half shall be the length thereof, and a cubit and a half the breadth thereof, and a cubit and a half the height thereof.--Exodus 25:10

וְעָשׂוּ אֲרוֹן, עֲצֵי שִׁטִּים:  אַמָּתַיִם וָחֵצִי אָרְכּוֹ, וְאַמָּה וָחֵצִי רָחְבּוֹ, וְאַמָּה וָחֵצִי, קֹמָתוֹ--Exodus 25:10

The word simply refers to a chest used for storage, even a coffin, as in the burial of the patriarch Joseph:

Joseph died, being a hundred and ten years old. And they embalmed him, and he was put in a coffin (בָּאָרוֹן ba-aron) in Egypt.--Genesis 50:26

וַיָּמָת יוֹסֵף, בֶּן-מֵאָה וָעֶשֶׂר שָׁנִים; וַיַּחַנְטוּ אֹתוֹ, וַיִּישֶׂם בָּאָרוֹן בְּמִצְרָיִם.--Genesis 50:26 

Also, a box or chest used to collect money in the temple:

And the priests consented that they should take no longer money from the people, neither repair the breaches of the house. And Jehoiada the priest took a chest (אֲרוֹן aron), and bored a hole in the lid of it, and set it beside the altar, on the right side as one cometh into the house of the LORD; and the priests that kept the threshold put therein all the money that was brought into the house of the LORD. And it was so, when they saw that there was much money in the chest (baaron בָּאָרוֹן), that the king's scribe and the high priest came up, and they put up in bags and counted the money that was found in the house of the LORD. --2 Kings 12:9-11 

  וַיִּקַּח יְהוֹיָדָע הַכֹּהֵן, אֲרוֹן אֶחָד, וַיִּקֹּב חֹר, בְּדַלְתּוֹ; וַיִּתֵּן אֹתוֹ אֵצֶל הַמִּזְבֵּחַ בימין (מִיָּמִין), בְּבוֹא-אִישׁ בֵּית יְהוָה, וְנָתְנוּ-שָׁמָּה הַכֹּהֲנִים שֹׁמְרֵי הַסַּף, אֶת-כָּל-הַכֶּסֶף הַמּוּבָא בֵית-יְהוָה. וַיֵּאֹתוּ, הַכֹּהֲנִים, לְבִלְתִּי קְחַת-כֶּסֶף מֵאֵת הָעָם, וּלְבִלְתִּי חַזֵּק אֶת-בֶּדֶק הַבָּיִת.וַיְהִי, כִּרְאוֹתָם, כִּי-רַב הַכֶּסֶף, בָּאָרוֹן; וַיַּעַל סֹפֵר הַמֶּלֶךְ, וְהַכֹּהֵן הַגָּדוֹל, וַיָּצֻרוּ וַיִּמְנוּ, אֶת-הַכֶּסֶף הַנִּמְצָא בֵית-יְהוָה.

Note even the English word coffin originally simply meant "basket." 

Egyptian chests/coffins did bear some similarity.

The Chest of Anubis had a chest with pole attached with a statue on top, while the ark had two cherubs. See Anubis shrine.

The Chest of Anubis had some sacred objects, the Ark did too.

Inside there were amulets made from faience, two alabaster vases, and eight breast plates. Thieves had undoubtedly rummaged through the casket as the objects, originally packaged and placed in compartments, were found heaped in disorder.-- Anubis Shrine of Tutankhamun

The ark of the covenant filled with some important Israelite sacred memorabilia: 

In it stood the golden altar of incense and the ark of the covenant overlaid on all sides with gold, in which there were a golden urn holding the manna, and Aaron’s rod that budded, and the tablets of the covenant;--Hebrews 9:4

Dilmun and Garden of Eden:

"Dimun, which was the equivalent of the Garden of Eden, or Paradise on earth."--The Search for Dilmun, HJ Finkel

Again:

DILMUN - In Sumerian mythology, the site of creation, paradise, where Utnapishtim is transported to with his wife after the great flood. --World History Encyclopedia, The Mesopotamian Pantheon

Sumerian literature on Dilmun is reminiscent of the Biblical prophets on paradise: 

In Dilmun the raven utters no cry. The ittidu-bird utters not the cry-of the ittidu-bird, 

The lion kills not, The wolf snatches not the lamb. 

Unknown is the kid-devouring wild dog, Unknown is the grain-devouring . . , 

Unknown is the widow...-Samuel Noah Kramer, Expedition Magazine - Penn Museum 

Compare with:

The wolf shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the young goat, and the calf and the lion and the fattened calf together; and a little child shall lead them.  The cow and the bear shall graze; their young shall lie down together; and the lion shall eat straw like the ox. The nursing child shall play over the hole of the cobra, and the weaned child shall put his hand on the adder's den. They shall not hurt or destroy in all my holy mountain; --Isaiah 11:6-9a

Note, however, the two places are likely far apart. Dilmun is generally seen as being around Bahrain in the Persian Gulf while Eden is unknown but being at the top of a mountain where 4 rivers have their source.

The Biblical Garden of Eden is the home of humans until expulsion for disobedience that God allows the just to return to in the age to come.

Dilmun on the other hand is not a home in anyway foe humans but for the gods alone and the only humans spoken of as being allowed to enter Dilmun are the Mesopotamian Noah and his wife after the Flood.

Other strange mention, coincidence?

περιστερά = Ishtar-bird?  (uncertain/coincidence)
And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water: and, lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove (περιστερὰν), and lighting upon him--Matthew 3:16 
Καὶ βαπτισθεὶς ὁ Ἰησοῦς ἀνέβη εὐθὺς ἀπὸ τοῦ ὕδατος· καὶ ἰδού, ἀνεῴχθησαν αὐτῷ οἱ οὐρανοί, καὶ εἴδεν τὸ πνεῦμα τοῦ θεοῦ καταβαῖνον ὡσεὶ περιστερὰν καὶ ἐρχόμενον ἐπ’ αὐτόν.--Matthew 3:16 RP Byzantine Majority Text 2005

And Jesus entered the temple and drove out all those who were buying and selling in the temple, and overturned the tables of the money changers and the seats of those who were selling doves (περιστεράς).--Matthew 21:12 

Καὶ εἰσῆλθεν ὁ Ἰησοῦς εἰς τὸ ἱερὸν τοῦ θεοῦ, καὶ ἐξέβαλεν πάντας τοὺς πωλοῦντας καὶ ἀγοράζοντας ἐν τῷ ἱερῷ, καὶ τὰς τραπέζας τῶν κολλυβιστῶν κατέστρεψεν, καὶ τὰς καθέδρας τῶν πωλούντων τὰς περιστεράς.--Matthew 21:12 RP Byzantine Majority Text 2005

The word περιστερά GR4085 (peristera) is disputed, it might mean perah Ishtar "bird of Ishtar"

According to the Syriac dictionary the word parha (noting its related to Hebraic vars. אפרוח‏ ):
prḥh, prḥtˀ (pārḥā, pāraḥtā)   n.f.  bird
1 bird  CPA, Syr, JBAmb, LJLA.  P Ho9:11 : ܐܝܟ ܦܪܚܬܐ ܦܪܚ ܐܝܩܪܗܘܢ‏ . P StDan(1)2:38 .  TgProv1:17 : מטול דמגן פריסא מצדתא על פרחתא דגדפא‏ .  TgProv26:2 : היך ציפרא דטאיס והיך פרחאתא דפרחא‏  †.
2  birds as a category or collective, like Hebrew העוף‏  Syr.  P Mt13:32 : ܦܿܵܪܲܚܬܼܵܐ ܕܿܲܫܡܲܝܵܐ ܬܿܲܩܸܢ ܒܿܣܲܘܟܸܿܝܗ̈‏  the birds of the sky will nest in its branches.   

 The dove in Greek myth is associated with the goddess Aphrodite, which, though not the equivalent of Ishtar, does have an origin in Ishtar, both were love goddesses. 

This is more an oddity of language, if true, and a warning against relying too much on etymology to prove a point. Similar, to how an etymology of ekklesia is not that meaningful when it can refer to a church or to a mob of people as in Acts.

It is worth noting, Greek adopting Semitic words for animals is not unheard of, the Greek (and English) word for camel is Semitic: καμηλος. The Hebrew is גָּמָל -- gamal. See this site.

Noah/Utnesphtim/Ziusudra/Naahmuuliel and the Flood

Noah's birth and name is described:

And he called his name Noah [Noach נֹחַ], saying: 'This same shall comfort us [יְנַחֲמֵנוּ y'nachamanu] in our work and in the toil of our hands, which cometh from the ground which the LORD hath cursed.'--Genesis 5:29

 וַיִּקְרָא אֶת-שְׁמוֹ נֹחַ, לֵאמֹר:  זֶה יְנַחֲמֵנוּ מִמַּעֲשֵׂנוּ, וּמֵעִצְּבוֹן יָדֵינוּ, מִן-הָאֲדָמָה, אֲשֶׁר אֵרְרָהּ יְהוָה.--Genesis 5:29 MT

The background for the Flood and Ark in the Bible are as follows:

And the earth was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence.  And God saw the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted their way upon the earth.  And God said unto Noah: 'The end of all flesh is come before Me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.--Genesis 6:11-14

Man corrupted the earth and became violent, therefore man must be wiped out (except for the Noahs)  

To the Sumerians the flood-hero was known as Ziusudra (“a life of long days”), spelled Xisouthros by the third century B.C.E. Babylonian priest, Berossus, in his retelling of the tale. In the Babylonian and Assyrian traditions, the hero was also known as Utnapishtim (“he found life”) or as Atrahasis (“exceedingly wise”). Though Jewish tradition explains the name Noah as coming from the Hebrew root for “comfort,” it may instead be a shortened form of the name Naahmuuliel, the name given to the flood-hero by the Hurrians, an ethnic group active in Mesopotamia in the second millennium B.C.E.--Handbook to Life in Ancient Mesopotamia, P 315

On the issue of the similarities of the Biblical Noah and the Mesopotamian counterpart:

In the Mesopotamian versions, a god warns an individual of...impending flood. The god then gives directions for the construction of a vessel designed to save a select group of human beings and animals. Once the deadly rains have ceased, the boat... rest on a mountaintop. ....the Mesopotamian Noah releases a series of birds in the hope they will fly back with evidence the flood is abating. Upon the receipt of this evidence, the passengers disembark and offer thanks to their god, who in turn promises never to send such a flood again.--Handbook to Life in Ancient Mesopotamia, P 314

On the issue of the differences of the Biblical Noah and the Mesopotamian counterpart:

The Mesopotamian Noah, on the other hand, is not explicitly saved because he is more righteous than his contemporaries. Nor does Enlil, the leader of the Mesopotamian gods, use the flood to punish sin. Instead, he floods the earth because a populous and noisy human race has been making him lose sleep. Throughout, the Biblical narrative has moral direction; indeed, after the flood God promulgates new ethical guidelines by which humankind must live. Conversely, Enlil is self-centered and concerned only with his own gratification; it is a divine subordinate, Ea, who warns the Mesopotamian Noah of the impending disaster.--Handbook to Life in Ancient Mesopotamia, P 315

The account in the Mesopotamian reads:

"Man of Shuruppak, son of Ubara-Tutu, Dismantle your house, build a boat. Leave possessions, search out living things. Reject chattels and save lives! Put aboard the seed of al living things, into the boat. The boat that you are to build Shall have her dimensions in proportion, Roof her like the Apsu." 

I realized and spoke to my master Ea, "I have paid attention to the words that you spoke in this way, My master, and I shall act upon them. But how can I explain myself to the city, the men and the elders?" 

Ea made his voice heard and spoke, He said to me, his servant, "You shall speak to them thus: "I think that Ellil has rejected me, And so I cannot stay in your city, And I cannot set foot on Ellil's land again. I must go down to the Apsu and stay with my master Ea. Then he will shower abundance upon you....--Myths of Mesopotamia, Gilgamesh XI

The Mesopotamian flood had the water rising 6 days and 7 nights:

"Six days and seven nights The wind continued, the deluge and windstorm leveled the land. When the seventh day arrived, The windstorm and deluge left off their battle, Which had struggled, like a woman in labor. The sea grew calm, the tempest stilled, the deluge ceased."--The Epic of Gilgamesh: A New Translation, Analogues, Criticism. Tablet XI, p. 88

The Biblical flood was much longer:

And the waters prevailed upon the earth a hundred and fifty days.--Genesis 7:24

The Mesopotamian flood has the boat landing on Mt. Nimush:

"The boat had come to rest of Mount Nimush, Mount Nimush held the boat fast, not letting it move..."--The Epic of Gilgamesh: A New Translation, Analogues, Criticism. Tablet XI, p. 88

 The Biblical ark lands on the mountains of Ararat (Kardu in the Aramaic Peshitta):

And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat--Genesis 8:4

 Furthermore, both accounts have the Noah figure sending out a bird for evidence of dry land:

"I brought out a dove and set it free. The dove went off and returned, No landing place came to its view, so it turned back. I brought out a swallow and set it free, The follow went off and returned, No landing place came to its view, so it turned back. I brought a raven and set it free. The raven went off and saw the ebbing of the waters. It ate, preened, left droppings, did not turn back"--The Epic of Gilgamesh: A New Translation, Analogues, Criticism. Tablet XI, p. 88-89

And it came to pass at the end of forty days, that Noah opened the window of the ark which he had made. And he sent forth a raven, and it went forth to and fro, until the waters were dried up from off the earth.  And he sent forth a dove from him, to see if the waters were abated from off the face of the ground.  But the dove found no rest for the sole of her foot, and she returned unto him to the ark, for the waters were on the face of the whole earth; and he put forth his hand, and took her, and brought her in unto him into the ark.  And he stayed yet other seven days; and again he sent forth the dove out of the ark. And the dove came in to him at eventide; and lo in her mouth an olive-leaf freshly plucked; so Noah knew that the waters were abated from off the earth. And he stayed yet other seven days; and sent forth the dove; and she returned not again unto him any more. --Genesis 8:6-12

The Mesopotamian Noah sent both a dove and raven just as the Biblical, albeit in a different orders. The Mesopotamian Noah also send out a swallow.

Both accounts end with a sacrifice offered for the survival:

"I brought out an offering and offered it to the four directions. I set up an incense offering on the summit of the mountain, I arranged seven and seven cult vessels....The gods smelled the savor, The gods smelled the sweet savor, The gods crowded round the sacrificer like flies--The Epic of Gilgamesh: A New Translation, Analogues, Criticism. Tablet XI, p. 89

And Noah builded an altar unto the LORD; and took of every clean beast, and of every clean fowl, and offered burnt-offerings on the altar. And the LORD smelled the sweet savour; ....--Genesis 8:20-21  

The Genesis account has God saying He will never do this again: 

and the LORD said in His heart: 'I will not again curse the ground any more for man's sake; for the imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more every thing living, as I have done. --Genesis 8:21

 The Babylonian account causes the gods to argue with one another. Enlil is furious at the other gods for allowing any humans to survive.

As soon as Enlil arrived, He saw the boat, Enlil flew into a rage, He was filled with fury at the gods: "Who came through alive? No man was to survive destruction!"--The Epic of Gilgamesh: A New Translation, Analogues, Criticism. Tablet XI, p. 90

The mother goddess defends the action and asks for other methods of destroying humans be used instead of a massive flood.

"You...are the wisest of the gods, How could you, irrationally, have brought on the flood? Punish the wrongdoer for his wrongdoing, Punish the transgressor for his transgression, But be lenient, lest he be cut off....Instead of a bringing on a flood, Let the lion rise up to diminish the human race!...Let the wolf rise up...Let the famine rise up.. Let pestilence rise up...--The Epic of Gilgamesh: A New Translation, Analogues, Criticism. Tablet XI, p. 90-91

The Biblical Noah and his wife die. The Babylonian one is granted eternal life and removed from humanity to their version of the Garden of Eden--Dilmun since they have "become like us gods." Reminiscent of Genesis where God said, "Man has become like one of us!"

He [Enlil] touched our brows, stood between us to bless us: "Hitherto Utanapishtim has been a human being, Now  Utanapishtim and his wife shall become like us gods. Utanapishtim shall dwell far distant at the source of the rivers."--The Epic of Gilgamesh: A New Translation, Analogues, Criticism. Tablet XI, p. 91

Noah's Ark

 The instructions for the Biblical Noah's ark (tevah תֵּבָה):

Make thee an ark of gopher wood; with rooms shalt thou make the ark, and shalt pitch it within and without with pitch. And this is how thou shalt make it: the length of the ark three hundred cubits, the breadth of it fifty cubits, and the height of it thirty cubits. --Genesis 6:11-14

The word ark is different from the ark of the Covenant, Noah's ark is called a tevah while the Ark of the Covenant is called an aron (coffin/box). Tevah is only used again in Exodus 2:3-5 to describe the box baby Moses floated on to be saved from male infanticide, possibly making him a new Noah. Tevah is likely a loan word from Egyptian where it simply means a box or chest. 

Jastow's dictionary for Tevah notes:

תֵּבָה, תֵּיבָה (b. h. תֵּבָה; Egyptian; v., however, תָּבָא)ship, ark, chest. Gen. R. s. 31 (play on קנים, Gen. VI, 14) מה הקן … אף תֵּיבָתְךָ וכ׳ as birds (v. קֵן) make the leper clean, so does thy ark cleanse thee. Ib. על שם תֵּיבָתוֹ של נח (it is called t’biḳin) from the measures of Noah’s ark. Y. Erub. V, 22ᶜ bot. כיצד היו ישראל … כת׳ how did the Israelites march in the desert?… like a chest (forming a square), opp. כקורה like a beam (in columns). Men. 94ᵇ כמין ת׳ פרוצה (the shape of the show-bread was) that of an open chest (without a lid and with a level bottom), opp. כמין ספינה רוקדת like a rocking ship (with a curved bottom). Sifra M’tsorʿa, Zab., Par. 1, ch. II תֵּיבַת הבלנים the bathers’ chest. Tosef. Kel. B. Mets. X, 1, sq.; a. fr.—Pl. תֵּבוֹת, תֵּי׳. Midr. Till. to Ps. I היה צריך לעשות ת׳ הרבה he would have been obliged to build many arks. Y. Sot. VIII, beg. 22ᵇ שהיו עשויין ת׳ ת׳ they (the Egyptians) were arrayed in squares.—Esp. the chest in the synagogue containing the scrolls of the Pentateuch. Sot. 38ᵇ, v. פְּסַק. Taan. II, 1 מוציאין את הת׳ וכ׳ (at prayer meetings) they bring the chest out to the open place of the town, and put ashes of wood on the chest &c. Meg. III, 1 בני העיר … בה"כ לוקחין ת׳ ת׳ וכ׳ if the citizens of a township sell … a synagogue, they may buy (for the money) a book chest; if they sell a chest, they may buy book wrappers; a. fr.—עבר לפני הת׳, ירד לפני הת׳ to go before the chest, to act as reader of prayers. Ber. 34ᵃ שירד לפני הת׳ וכ׳ who recited the prayers in the presence of &c. Ib. V, 3 העובר לפני הת׳ וטעה וכ׳ if a reader makes a mistake (reads heretical formulas), another person must pass before the chest in his place. Ib. 4. Ib. 34ᵃ העובר לפני הת׳ צריך לסרב he that is asked to read the prayers &c., v. סָרַב. Taan. II, 2 מורידין לפני הת׳ וכ׳ we depute as reader (on fast days) an old man &c.; a. v. fr. —2) word. Men. 30ᵇ ת׳ בת שתי וכ׳ a word of two letters. Sabb. 104ᵃ they did not know הי באמצע ת׳ וכ׳ in which (of the two forms of the letters מנצפ"ך) were to be employed in the middle of a word, and which at the end; a. fr.—Pl. תֵּיבוֹת, תֵּיבִיּוֹת. Ḥull. 64ᵇ דפסק … ת׳ (v. Rabb. D. S. a. l. note 40) where the scribe divides them into two words; ib. 65ᵃ. Y. Meg. I, 71ᶜ bot. תיביות; a. e. 

The proportions provided in Genesis are then 300:50:30, or 10:1.66:1, whereas the Mesopotamian ark mentioned above was described as:

"One full acre was her deck space, Ten dozen cubits, the height of each of her sides, Ten dozen cubits square, her outer dimensions"---- The Epic of Gilgamesh: A New Translation, Analogues, Criticism. Tablet XI, p. 86, 57-59

In other words: 120:120:120 simplified to: 1:1:1. As often said, a floating cube since its dimensions are the same.

The volume of Noah's ark (ignoring ships tend narrow going down): 450,000 cubits^3

The volume of Utnesphtim's ark (ignoring ships tend narrow): 1,728,000 cubits^3

The Mesopotamian vessel was 3.84 times bigger in volume than the Biblical ark! Of course, this assumes the cubits in Israel and those of Mesopotamia were roughly the same. Noah's "chest" is more what you expect from a chest, while the Mesopotamians had a cube.

Both the Hebrew and Mesopotamian arks were populated with animals and family:

"What silver I had I loaded upon her, What gold I had I loaded upon her, What living creatures I had I loaded upon her, I sent up on board all my family and kin, Beasts of the steppe, wild animals of the steppe, all types of skilled craftsmen I sent up on board."--The Epic of Gilgamesh: A New Translation, Analogues, Criticism. Tablet XI, p. 87, 82-87

Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee seven and seven, each with his mate; and of the beasts that are not clean two [and two], each with his mate--Genesis 7:2

And Noah went in, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him, into the ark, because of the waters of the flood.--Genesis 7:7

The Mesopotamian Noah, however, seemed to also bring along many skilled laborers with him! He also, loaded lots of money (why?)! The Hebrew's Noah has no hint to using contract labor.

The calking of the ark in the Bible was done by God Himself (Genesis 7:16), the Mesopotamian one is done by Puzur Amurri "the boatman", clearly an Amurru name! This was by command of the sun god, Shamash.

see also Dalley 1991: Mesopotamian myth

Other future topics: 

https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/canaanite-religion-literature

Temple

angels, demons, holy days

Friday, May 12, 2023

St Theodore of Tarsus, Orthodox England, Papacy and Filioque

Some Orthodox claim pre 1066 England was Orthodox, not "Roman Catholic." The claim is absurd.

Below is the English saint Bede the Venerable's history on an English synod in AD 680 where a GREEK Christian presided over the English as primate, the Archbishop of Canterbury He was St Theodore of Tarsus, who was born in the east and was thoroughly Greek. Note how him and synod accepted the filioque and plainly says the Pope appointed him:

CHAPTER XVII
OF THE SYNOD HELD IN THE PLAIN OF HEATHFIELD, WHERE ARCHBISHOP THEODORE PRESIDED.
[A.D. 680]
ABOUT this time, Theodore being informed that the faith of the church at Constantinople was much perplexed by the heresy of Eutyches, and desiring to preserve the churches of the English, over which he presided, from that infection, an assembly of many venerable priests and doctors was convened, at which he diligently inquired into their doctrines, and found they all unanimously agreed in the Catholic faith. This he took care to have committed to writing by the authority of the synod, as a memorial, and for the instruction of succeeding generations ; the beginning of which instrument is as follows

" In the name of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, in the tenth year of the reign of our most pious lord, Egfrid, king of the Northumbrians, the seventeenth of September, the eighth indiction; and in the sixth year of the reign of Ethelfrid, king of the Mercians, in the seventeenth year of the reign of Aldhulf, of the East Angles, in the seventh year of the reign of Lothair, king of Kent; Theodore, by the grace of God, archbishop of the island of Britain, and of the city of Canterbury, being president, and the other venerable bishops of the island of Britain sitting with him, the holy Gospels being laid before them, at the place which, in the Saxon tongue, is called Heathfield, we conferred together, and expounded the true and orthodox faith, as our Lord Jesus in the flesh delivered the same to his disciples, who saw Him present, and heard his words, and as it is delivered in the creed of the holy fathers, and by all holy and universal synods in general, and by the consent of all approved doctors of the Catholic church; we, therefore, following them jointly and orthodoxly, and professing accordance to their divinely inspired doctrine, do believe, and do, according to the holy fathers, firmly confess, properly and truly, the Father, and Son, and Holy Ghost, a trinity consubstantial in unity, and unity in trinity, that is, one God subsisting in three consubstantial persons, of equal honour and glory."

And after much more of this sort, appertaining to the confession of the true faith, this holy synod added to its instrument, "We have received the five holy and general councils of the blessed fathers acceptable to God; that is, Of 318 bishops, who were assembled at Nice, against the most impious Arius and his tenets; and at Constantinople, Of 150, against the madness of Macedonius and Eudoxius, and their tenets; and at Ephesus, first of 200, against the most wicked Nestorius and his tenets; and at Chalcedon, of 360, against Eutyches and Nestorius, and their tenets, and again at Constantinople. In a fifth council, in the reign of Justinian the younger, against Theodorus and Theodoret, and the epistles of Iba, and their tenets, against Cyril;" and again a little lower, "the synod held in the city of Rome, in the time of the blessed Pope Martin, in the eighth indiction, and in the ninth year of the most pious Emperor Constantine, we receive : and we glorify our Lord Jesus Christ, as they glorified Him, neither adding nor diminishing anything ; anathematizing those with our hearts and mouths whom they anathematized, and receiving those whom they received, glorifying God the Father, who is without beginning, and his only ­begotten Son generated from eternity, and the Holy Ghost proceeding from the Father and the Son in an ineffable manner, as those holy apostles, prophets, and doctors, whom we have above-mentioned, did declare. And all we, who, with Archbishop Theodore, have thus expounded the Catholic faith, have also subscribed thereto."--Bede the Venerable, Ecclesiastical History of the English Nation, Book IV, CHAPTER XVII: Synod of Heathfield (680)  

In addition, St Theodore spoke of himself as being appointed by the papacy: 

" In the name of our Lord God and Saviour Jesus Christ, who reigns for ever and for ever, and governs his church, it was thought meet that we should assemble, according to the custom of the venerable canons, to treat about the necessary affairs of the church. We met on the 24th day of September, the first indiction, at a place called Hertford, myself, Theodore, the unworthy bishop of the see of Canterbury, appointed by the Apostolic See, our fellow priest and most reverend brother, Bisi, bishop of the East Angles.."--Bede the Venerable, Ecclesiastical History of the English Nation, Book IV, CHAPTER XVII: Synod of Hertford (670)

Incredible how even the Greek archbishop of Canterbury was a papal appointment and filioque subscriber was supposedly Eastern Orthodox in theology!


Saturday, April 29, 2023

St Maximus the Confessor and Apokatastasis

 Online and elsewhere it's been suggested that St Maximus the Confessor professed a heretical understanding of apokatastasis, that is universal reconciliation. The doctrine that Hell is essentially a purgatory, which fires will eventually burn out and the sinners will be taken to heaven. It would be problematic if St Maximus did profess universalism since it was condemned in AD 543 by the Pope, Patriarch of Constantinople, and Emperor.

One quote floating around online attributed to St Maximus (typically in Orthodox forums) is:

"We should pray that apokatastasis is true, but it would be foolish to preach it as doctrine"

The source is rarely, if ever, cited. The implication is that the doctrine should be hoped for but certainly not preached and be kept secret. This is the contention by people like Hans Ur von Balthasar who believed St Maximus secretly held the doctrine but did not want to come out and say it to avoid suspicion of heresy and the implication it might bring.

 One Eastern Orthodox priest informed me the source is "Expositions on Psalm 59" from Migne, Patrologia Graeca. A translation of Expositions on Psalm 59 is available online by Paul Blowers (a Protestant). No where in it is the word apokatastasis used, or is the doctrine hinted at. Its another dead end. St Maximus did have much to say on the issue. He was not utterly opposed to the term since Scripture does use it ie. Acts 3:21. I am not able to find the Greek text (Corpus Christianorum Series Graeca 23: 3-22) for this section since it's not online, however JP Migne does have it in Greek and in Latin here starting at 855.

Elsewhere, St Maximus does provide 3 orthodox understandings of the word--none of which result in universal reconciliation of the damned humans and devils. 

Ἐπειδή Γρηγόριος ὁ Νύσσης ἐν τοῖς ἑαυτοῦ συγγράμμασι, φαίνεται τοῖς μή τό βάθος ἐπισταμένοις τῆς ὑψηλῆς αὐτοῦ θεωρίας πανταχοῦ [R. πολλαχοῦ] ἀποκατάστασιν ὑπεμφαίνειν, παρακαλῶ ὅπερ ἐπίστασαι περί τούτου εἰπέ.  
Ἀπόκρισις.                    
Τρεῖς ἀποκαταστάσεις οἶδεν ἡ Ἐκκλησία. Μίαν μέν, τήν ἑκάστου κατά τόν τῆς ἀρετῆς λόγον· ἐν ᾗ ἀποκαθίσταται, τόν ἐπ᾿ αὐτῷ λόγον τῆς ἀρετῆς ἐκπληρώσας. Δευτέραν δέ, τήν τῆς ὅλης φύσεως ἐν τῇ ἀναστάσει. Τήν εἰς ἀφθαρσίαν καί ἀθανασίαν ἀποκατάστασιν. Τρίτην δέ, ᾗ καί μάλιστα κατακέχρηται ἐν τοῖς ἑαυτοῦ λόγοις ὁ Νύσσης Γρηγόριος, ἔστιν αὕτη, ἡ τῶν ψυχικῶν δυνάμεων τῇ ἁμαρτίᾳ ὑποπεσουσῶν, εἰς ὅπερ ἐκτίσθησαν πάλιν ἀποκατάστασις. Δεῖ γάρ, ὥσπερ τήν ὅλην φύσιν ἐν τῇ ἀναστάσει τῆς σαρκός ἀφθαρσίαν χρόνῳ ἐλπιζομένῳ ἀπολαβεῖν· οὕτως καί τάς παρατραπείσας τῆς ψυχῆς δυνάμεις, τῇ παρατάσει τῶν αἰώνων ἀπολαβεῖν τάς ἐντεθείσας αὐτῆς τῆς κακίας μνήμας· καί περάσασαν τούς πάντας αἰῶνας, καί μή εὑρίσκουσαν στάσιν, εἰς τόν Θεόν ἐλθεῖν τόν μή ἔχοντα πέρας. Καί οὕτως τῇ ἐπιγνώσει, οὐ τῇ μεθέξει τῶν ἀγαθῶν, ἀπολαβεῖν τάς δυνάμεις, καί εἰς τό ἀρχαῖον ἀποκαταστῆναι, καί δειχθῆναι τόν δημιουργόν ἀναίτιον τῆς ἁμαρτίας. -- ΄Αγιος Μάξιμος ο Ομολογητής: Πεύσεις και Αποκρίσεις και Ερωτήσεις και Εκλογαί διαφόρων κεφαλαίων απορουμένων , PG 90 Questiones et Dubia 13, PG 90:796AC
The Church knoweth three apokatastases. One is the [apokatastasis] of everything according to the principle (logos) of virtue; in this apokatastasis one is restored who fulfills the principle of virtue in himself. The second is that of the whole [human nature] in the Resurrection. This is the apokatastasis to incorruption and immortality. The third, in the oft-cited words of Gregory of Nyssa, is the apokatastasis of the powers of the soul which, having lapsed into sin, are again restored to that condition in which they were created. For it is necessary that just as the entire nature of the flesh hopeth in time to be taken up again into incorruption in the apokatastasis, so also the powers of the soul, having become distorted during the course of the ages had instilled in it a memory of evil, so that at the end of ages, not finding any rest, will come unto God Who hath no limit. And thus the distorted powers of the soul will be taken up into the primeval apokatastasis, into a merely discursive knowledge of, but not into the participation in, the good things [of God], where the Creator is known yet without being the cause of [their] sin.--St Maximus, Ad Thalassium, PG 90:796BC. Cited in the Disputations with Pyrrhus trans. by Farrell, Introduction, p. xxxii
Below is a separate translation of the blue text:
“The third meaning [of apokatastasis] is used by Gregory especially in reference to the qualities of the soul that had been corrupted by sin and then are restored to their original state. Just as all nature will regain, at the expected time, its completeness in the flesh [at the resurrection], so also will the powers of the soul, by necessity, shed all imprints of evil clinging to them; and this after aeons have elapsed, after a long time of being driven about without rest [stasis]. And so in the end they reach God, who is without limitations [peras]. Thus they are restored to their original state [apokatastēnai] through their knowledge [of God], but do not participate in [his] gifts. It also will appear that the Creator cannot be blamed for any sinfulness.” Maximus, Questiones et dubia [Questions and doubts] 13, PG 90, 796AC (translated by Hans Ur von Balthasar himself in footnote 21)

Elsewhere, in his commentary on the Lord's prayer St Maximus affirms eternal torment for sins.

Indeed there exists but one happiness, a communion of life with the Word, the loss of which is an endless punishment which goes on for all eternity. And that is why abandoning his body and whatever is the body’s he strives intensely toward that communion of life with God, thinking that the only loss – even he were master of everything on earth – would be in the failure of the deification by grace which he pursues. --St Maximus the Confessor, Commentary on the Our Father

Separately, on the topic, it's also worth noting the last Church Father, St John of Damascus said:

All wickedness, then, and all impure passions are the work of their mind. But while the liberty to attack man has been granted to them, they have not the strength to over-master any one: for we have it in our power to receive or not to receive the attack. Wherefore there has been prepared for the devil and his demons, and those who follow him, fire unquenchable and everlasting punishment (Matthew 25:41).  Note, further, that what in the case of man is death is a fall in the case of angels. For after the fall there is no possibility of repentance for them, just as after death there is for men no repentance.--St John Damascene, An Exposition of the Orthodox Faith (Book II):  Chapter 4

Tuesday, March 21, 2023

Emperor Justinian and Papal primacy

Emperor Justinian is often known for his Erastianism aka Caesaropapism where essentially the government controls the Church (he appointed and deposed bishops at will, kidnapped, and imprisoned others, his wife deposed in effect Pope St. Silverius). Yet, he is venerated as a saint by Byzantine Christianity alongside the similarly troublesome Emperor Constantine the Great. However, despite Justinian's deposition and replacement of bishops, he also seemed to recognize the authority of the Roman See.

Justinian in a letter to the Patriarch of Constantinople (who he illicitly called ecumenical) states the Pope of Rome is the "head of the most holy priest of God" and wanted to protect unity with the Papacy:
...We issued a divine edict, also known to Your Holiness, in which We refuted the madness of the heretics; yet We neither have changed nor now change nor have neglected the status of the Church, which has hitherto prevailed with the help of God, as Your Blessedness also knows; but in all things We have protected the unity of the most holy churches with the most holy Pope and Patriarch of ancient Rome, to whom We have written a similar letter.  For We suffer nothing concerning the state of the Church to be withheld from His Blessedness, inasmuch as he is the head (κεφαλή) of the most holy priests of God, and because whenever heretics have arisen in those parts (the West), they have been restrained by the counsel and the correct judgment of his Venerable See.--The Codex of Justinian, First Book, 1.6-1.7, page 25, Letter of Emperor Justinian to Patriarch Epiphanius of Constantinople, March 26, AD 533. 

..δπερ καί ή σή γινώσκει άγιωσύνη, δι’ οΰ τήν τών αιρετικών μανίαν ήλέγξαμεν, ούδέν παντελώς έναλλάξαντες ή έναλλάττοντες ή παρεξελθόντες τής μέχρι νϋν σύν θεώ κρατούσης εκκλησιαστικής καταστάσεως, καθά και ή σή γινώσκει μακαριστής, άλλα διά πάντων φυλάττοντες τήν κατάστασιν τής ένώσεως τών άγιωτάτων εκκλησιών τής πρός τόν άγιώτατον πάπαν τής πρεσβυτέρας 'Ρώμης κα'ι πατριάρχην, πρός δν καί τά δμοια τούτοις γεγράφαμεν. Ούτε γάρ άνεχόμεθά τι τών εις εκκλησιαστικήν όρώντων κατάστασιν μή καί τή αυτού άναφέρεσθαι μακαριότητι, ώς κεφαλή ουση πάντων τών άγιωτάτων του θεοΰ ιερέων, καί επειδή, οσάκις έν τούτοις τοϊς μέρεσιν αιρετικοί άνεφύησαν, τή γνώμη καί ορθή κρίσει έκείνου τοΰ σεβασμίου θρόνου κατηργήθησαν. 3· Έκ γάρ τών παρουσών θείων ήμών συλλαβών μαθήσεται ή σή άγιωσύνη τά παρ’ ήμών προτεθειμένα, έφ’ ω τούς έπιχειροΰντας πονηρώς νοεΐν ή έρμηνεύειν τά παρ’ ήμών όρθώς έν τώ ήδίκτω λεχθέντα έκ τών παρουσών θείων ήμών έλέγχεσθαι συλλαβών. --The Codex of Justinian, First Book, 1.6-1.7, page 24, Letter of Emperor Justinian to Patriarch Epiphanius of Constantinople, March 26, AD 533. (Greek text)

In a letter to Pope John II, Emperor Justinian stated he made the Eastern churches subject and united to the Papacy, again stating the Papacy is "the head of all holy churches."

Rendering honor to the Apostolic See and to Your Holiness, which has always been and remains Our wish, as it ought to be, and honoring Your Blessedness as a father, We hasten to bring to the notice of Your Holiness everything concerning the status of the churches, since We have always greatly desired to preserve the unity of Your Apostolic See and to maintain the status of the Holy Churches of God, as it has heretofore prevailed and continues undisturbed without the interference of anything to the contrary. 9. We have therefore hastened to make all priests of the whole Orient subject to the See of Your Holiness and to unite them with it. 10. And We therefore deemed it necessary to bring to the notice of Your Holiness what action presently has been taken here, although it is clear and unquestioned and has ever been resolutely observed and preached by all priests in accord with the teaching of Your Apostolic See. For We permit no action to be taken concerning the status of the churches, however clear and unquestioned it may be, but that it should come to the notice of Your Holiness, because You are the head of all holy churches. For in all ways, as stated, We strive to increase the honor and authority of Your See.--The Codex of Justinian, First Book, 1.8, page 34-35, Letter of Emperor Justinian to Pope John II, June 6, AD 533. 

Reddentes honorem apostolicae sedi et vestrae sanctitati, quod semper nobis in voto fuit et est, ut decet, patrem honorantes vestram beatitudinem omnia, quae ad ecclesiarum statum pertinent, festinamus ad notitiam deferre vestrae sanctitatis, quoniam semper magnum nobis fuit studium unitatem vestrae apostolicae sedis et statum sanctarum dei ecclesiarum custodiri, qui hactenus obtinet et incommote permanet nulla intercedente contrarietate. 9. Ideoque omnes sacerdotes universi orientalis tractus et subicere et unire sedi vestrae sanctitatis properavimus. 10. Et in praesenti ergo quae hic commota sunt, quamvis manifesta et indubitata sint et secundum apostolicae vestrae sedis doctrinam ab omnibus semper sacerdotibus firme custodita et praedicata, necessarium duximus, ut ad notitiam vestrae sanctitatis perveniant. 11. Nec enim patimur quicquam, quod ad ecclesiarum statum pertinet, quamvis manifestum et indubitatum sit, quod movetur, ut non etiam vestrae innotescat sanctitati, quia caput est omnium sanctarum ecclesiarum, per omnia enim, ut dictum est, properamus honorem et auctoritatem crescere vestrae sedis. --The Codex of Justinian, First Book, 1.8, page 34-35, Letter of Emperor Justinian to Pope John II, June 6, AD 533. (Latin text)

In the same letter it states he follows the Roman church "in all things":

This then is Your true faith, this Your unshakeable religion; this all the fathers of blessed memory, as We have said, and the heads of the Roman Church, whom We follow in all things; this the Apostolic See has preached to this day and unshakeably guarded. Every opponent of this confession, of this faith, has declared himself alien to Holy Communion, alien to the Catholic Church--The Codex of Justinian, First Book, 1.8, page 38, Letter of Emperor Justinian to Pope John II, June 6, AD 533.

Haec est igitur vestra vera fides, haec certa religio, hoc beatae recordationis, ut diximus, patres omnes praesulesque Romanae ecclesiae, quos in omnibus sequimur, hoc sedes apostolica praedicavit hactenus et inconvulse custodivit: huic confessioni, huic fidei quisquis contradictor extiterit, alienum a sancta communione, alienum se ipse ab ecclesia indicavit esse catholica. --The Codex of Justinian, First Book, 1.8, page 37, Letter of Emperor Justinian to Pope John II, June 6, AD 533.

 In the same codex Justinian contained Pope John II's letter to the Emperor, where the pope asserts he is the read of the churches:

Amid the glowing praise of the wisdom of Your Mildness, Most Christian of Emperors, there shines with an especially pure light, like that of a star, the fact that You, in Your zeal for the faith and Your Christian charity, well instructed in the teachings of the Church, keep (Your) reverence of the See of Rome, submit everything to it, and lead everything to its unity; to whose founder, that is, the First of the Apostles, Our Lord gave this precept: "Feed my sheep.”[John 21] That this See is truly the head of all churches, both the regulations of the fathers and the statutes of emperors declare, as the most reverent utterances of Your Piety also attest.--Letter of Pope John II to Emperor Justinian, First Book, 1.7-8, page 31

Inter claras sapientiae mansuetudinis vestrae laudes, christianissime principum, puriore luce tamquam aliquod sidus irradiat, quod amore fidei, quod caritatis studio, edocti ecclesiasticis disciplinis, Romanae sedis reverentiam conservatis et ei cuncta subicitis et ad eius deducitis unitatem, ad cuius auctorem, hoc est apostolorum primum, domino loquente praeceptum est: ‘pasce oves meas’. i. Quam esse omnium vere ecclesiarum caput et patrum regulae et principum statuta declarant et pietatis vestrae reverentissimi testantur affatus --Letter of Pope John II to Emperor Justinian, First Book, 1.7-8, page 30

To be continued... 

Sunday, March 12, 2023

Leavened vs Unleavened bread, Does artos always mean leavened bread?

On the issue of leaven bread vs unleavened bread, some claim artos always means leavened bread and cannot mean unleavened bread, and since Christ used artos in the last supper, therefore leavened bread was used.

Jesus refers to the showbread simply as artous:

how he entered the house of God and took and ate the bread (ἄρτους) of the Presence, which is not lawful for any but the priests to eat, and also gave it to those with him?”--Luke 6:4

Ὡς εἰσῆλθεν εἰς τὸν οἶκον τοῦ θεοῦ, καὶ τοὺς ἄρτους τῆς προθέσεως ἔλαβεν, καὶ ἔφαγεν, καὶ ἔδωκεν καὶ τοῖς μετ' αὐτοῦ, οὓς οὐκ ἔξεστιν φαγεῖν εἰ μὴ μόνους τοὺς ἱερεῖς;--Luke 6:4

The bread is found in the book of Exodus and called lehem (bread) in Hebrew, artous in Greek:

 And thou shalt set upon the table showbread (לֶחֶם פָּנִים) before Me alway--Exodus 25:30

וְנָתַתָּ עַל-הַשֻּׁלְחָן לֶחֶם פָּנִים, לְפָנַי תָּמִיד.--Exodus 25:30 MT

 And you shall place upon the table facing loaves (ἄρτους), in front me always.--Exodus 25:30 NETS translation of LXX

καὶ ἐπιθήσεις ἐπὶ τὴν τράπεζαν ἄρτους ἐνωπίους ἐναντίον μου διὰ παντός--Exodus 25:29 (30) LXX

The Bread of the Presence is referred to by Josephus as both artous (bread) and azymous (unleavened).

Upon this table, which was placed on the north side of the temple, not far from the most holy place, were laid twelve unleavened loaves of bread, six upon each heap, one above another: they were made of two tenth-deals of the purest flour, which tenth-deal [an omer] is a measure of the Hebrews, containing seven Athenian cotyloe; and above those loaves were put two vials full of frankincense. Now after seven days other loaves were brought in their stead, on the day which is by us called the Sabbath; for we call the seventh day the Sabbath. But for the occasion of this intention of placing loaves here, we will speak to it in another place.--Josephus Antiquities of the Jews, Book 3.142 

ἐπὶ ταύτης, ἐτίθετο γὰρ ἐν τῷ ναῷ τετραμμένη πρὸς ἄρκτον οὐ πόρρω τοῦ μυχοῦ, διετίθεσαν ἄρτους τε δώδεκα ἀζύμους κατὰ ἓξ ἐπαλλήλους καθαροῦ πάνυ τοῦ ἀλεύρου ἐκ δύο ἀσσάρων, ὃ μέτρον Ἑβραίων ἑπτὰ κοτύλας Ἀττικὰς ἔχει. --Josephus Antiquities of the Jews Book 3.142

Continuing on the same subject, Josephus simply referred to it as simply arton/artoi

and above those loaves (ἄρτων) were put two vials full of frankincense. Now after seven days other loaves (ἄρτοι) were brought in their stead, on the day which is by us called the Sabbath; for we call the seventh day the Sabbath. But for the occasion of this intention of placing loaves here, we will speak to it in another place. 
ὑπὲρ δὲ τῶν ἄρτων ἐτίθεντο φιάλαι δύο χρύσεαι λιβάνου πλήρεις, μετὰ δὲ ἡμέρας ἑπτὰ πάλιν ἄλλοι ἐκομίζοντο ἄρτοι ἐν τῷ καλουμένῳ ὑφ᾽ ἡμῶν Σαββάτῳ: τὴν γὰρ ἑβδόμην ἡμέραν Σάββατα καλοῦμεν: τὴν δ᾽ αἰτίαν ἐξ ἧς ταῦτα ἐπενοήθησαν ἐν ἑτέροις ἐροῦμεν.  

 Josephus saw no issue in calling unleavened bread as ἄρτους. This undermines the claim artos always means leavened bread.

In addition, Jews regard the bread as matzah, unleavened bread like that used for passover.

This Jewish article states the temple show bread was unleavened:

It was called bread, but it was matzah. It stood in the open air for a full week and didn’t become stale. And its preparation required special expertise.--The Showbread: The How and Why of the Temple Bread Offering

The Talmud says:

it is written here bread’,14 and it is also written in connection with the Two Loaves ‘bread’;15 as there there was one tenth [of an ephah] for each loaf, so here there must be one tenth for each cake. Or perhaps argue thus: it is written here ‘bread’, and also there in connection with the Shewbread it is written ‘bread’;16 as there there were two tenths for each loaf, so here there must be two tenths for each cake. Let us then see to which of the two is this case most similar. We may infer a meal-offering which is leavened and offered with an animal-offering17 from another meal-offering which is leavened and is offered with an animal-offering,18 but let not the Shewbread enter into the argument seeing that it is neither leavened nor offered with an animal-offering.--Talmud, Tractate: Menachoth 77b 

In a long debate about over Leviticus 2:11 and when and how the prohibition of leaven is applied, one rabbi mentioned:  

R. Akiba says, It includes the Shewbread, so that it too comes within the prohibition of leavening.--Talmud, Tractate: Menachoth 57b 

As a side note, the Talmud says also:

they used to lift it [shewbread table] up and exhibit the Shewbread on it to those who came up for the festivals, saying to them, Behold, God's love for you!--Menachoth 29a

Reminiscent of "behold the lamb of God" when the eucharistic host is lifted up by the priest in the Roman rite.

One reason for why it's unlikely leavened bread was used for the showbread was because Leviticus banned its use:

No grain offering that you bring to the LORD shall be made with leaven (חָמֵץ), for you shall burn no leaven nor any honey as a food offering to the LORD.--Leviticus 2:11

כָּל-הַמִּנְחָה, אֲשֶׁר תַּקְרִיבוּ לַיהוָה--לֹא תֵעָשֶׂה, חָמֵץ:  כִּי כָל-שְׂאֹר וְכָל-דְּבַשׁ, לֹא-תַקְטִירוּ מִמֶּנּוּ אִשֶּׁה לַיהוָה.--Leviticus 2:11 MT 

You shall not prepare any sacrifice that you may bring to the Lord, with leaven (ζυμωτόν), for you shall not present any leaven (ζύμην) and any honey to offer of it to the Lord.--Leviticus 2:11 (NETS translation of LXX)

πᾶσαν θυσίαν ἣν ἂν προσφέρητε κυρίῳ οὐ ποιήσετε ζυμωτόν πᾶσαν γὰρ ζύμην καὶ πᾶν μέλι οὐ προσοίσετε ἀπ᾽ αὐτοῦ καρπῶσαι κυρίῳ --Leviticus 2:11 LXX

For this reason, it seems unlikely the Eucharist would use leavened bread. 

Cleanse out the old leaven (ζύμην) that you may be a new lump, as you really are unleavened (ἄζυμοι). For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed.--1 Corinthians 5:7

Ἐκκαθάρατε τὴν παλαιὰν ζύμην, ἵνα ἦτε νέον φύραμα, καθώς ἐστε ἄζυμοι. Καὶ γὰρ τὸ Πάσχα ἡμῶν ὑπὲρ ἡμῶν ἐτύθη χριστός·--1 Corinthians 5:7 Byzantine Majority

St Paul says to cast out the leaven and be unleavened, and that Christ is our passover. For the passover, leaven was strictly forbidden.

Seven days shall ye eat unleavened bread; howbeit the first day ye shall put away leaven out of your houses; for whosoever eateth leavened bread from the first day until the seventh day, that soul shall be cut off from Israel. --Exodus 12:15

שִׁבְעַת יָמִים, מַצּוֹת תֹּאכֵלוּ--אַךְ בַּיּוֹם הָרִאשׁוֹן, תַּשְׁבִּיתוּ שְּׂאֹר מִבָּתֵּיכֶם:  כִּי כָּל-אֹכֵל חָמֵץ, וְנִכְרְתָה הַנֶּפֶשׁ הַהִוא מִיִּשְׂרָאֵל--מִיּוֹם הָרִאשֹׁן, עַד-יוֹם הַשְּׁבִעִי.--Exodus 12:15

The Greek translation of the LXX reads:

For seven days you shall eat unleavened (ἄζυμα) bread, but from the first day you shall remove leaven (ζύμην) from your houses. Everyone, whoever eats leaven (ζύμην), that soul shall be destroyed from Israel, from the first day until the seventh day.--Exodus 12:15 (NETS translation of LXX)

ἑπτὰ ἡμέρας ἄζυμα ἔδεσθε ἀπὸ δὲ τῆς ἡμέρας τῆς πρώτης ἀφανιεῖτε ζύμην ἐκ τῶν οἰκιῶν ὑμῶν πᾶς ὃς ἂν φάγῃ ζύμην ἐξολεθρευθήσεται ἡ ψυχὴ ἐκείνη ἐξ Ισραηλ ἀπὸ τῆς ἡμέρας τῆς πρώτης ἕως τῆς ἡμέρας τῆς ἑβδόμης--Exodus 12:15 LXX

The main argument that Christ used leavened is based on the assumption that the Last Supper was not a Passover meal, regardless, Paul certainly believed Christ was the Passover sacrifice.

We see St Cyril of Jerusalem believed the showbread was a foreshadow of the eucharist:

5. In the Old Testament also there was show-bread; but this, as it belonged to the Old Testament, has come to an end; but in the New Testament there is Bread of heaven, and a Cup of salvation, sanctifying soul and body; for as the Bread corresponds to our body, so is the Word appropriate to our soul.--St Cyril of Jerusalem. Catechetical Lectures: chapter 22

Likewise, St Basil of Caesarea:

He proclaims the renewal of the Temple, the observance of the worship of the Law, a typical high priest over again after the real High Priest, and a sacrifice for sins after the Lamb of God Who takes away the sin of the world. [John 1:29] He preaches partial baptisms after the one baptism, and the ashes of a heifer sprinkling the Church which, through its faith in Christ, has not spot or wrinkle, or any such thing; [Ephesians 5:27] cleansing of leprosy after the painless state of the resurrection; an offering of jealousy when they neither marry nor are given in marriage; show-bread after the Bread from heaven; burning lamps after the true Light. In a word, if the law of the Commandments has been done away with by dogmas, it is plain that under these circumstances the dogmas of Christ will be nullified by the injunctions of the law. --St Basil, Letter 265

St John of Damascus when writing about the eucharist states:

With bread and wine Melchisedek, the priest of the most high God, received Abraham on his return from the slaughter of the Gentiles. [Genesis 14:18] That table pre-imaged this mystical table, just as that priest was a type and image of Christ, the true high-priest. [Leviticus xiv] For you are a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedek. Of this bread the show-bread was an image. This surely is that pure and bloodless sacrifice which the Lord through the prophet said is offered to Him from the rising to the setting of the sun [Malachi 1:11] . --St John Damascene, An Exposition of the Orthodox Faith, Book IV: chapter 13

Likewise, when discussing the traditional practice of abstinence from sex prior to receiving communion (along the same lines Roman priestly celibacy is linked to this too), St Jerome, St Augustine, and St Gregory the Great cite the passage in the gospel about the show bread:

I am out of order in violating historical sequence, but I may point out that the same thing was said by [1 Samuel 21:4] Ahimelech the priest to David when he fled to Nob: "If only the young men have kept themselves from women." And David answered, "of a truth about these three days." For the show-bread, like the body of Christ, might not be eaten by those who rose from the marriage bed.--St Jerome, Against Jovinianus (Book I)

Hence also it is said through the priest to David concerning his servants, that if they were pure from women they might eat the show bread; which they might not receive at all unless David first declared them to be pure from women. Still a man who after intercourse with his wife has been washed with water may receive even the mystery of sacred communion, since according to the opinion above expressed it was allowable for him to enter the church.--Pope Gregory the Great, Registrum Epistolarum: Book XI, Letter 64 

The argument that leavened bread should be used for the eucharist mostly only works within the framework of Byzantinized Christianity that sees the leaven as symbolic of life and resurrection. The Biblical symbolism largely favors the unleavened bread.